NFL players question alumni group

Fox Sports, by A.J. Perez and Alex Marvez
January 26, 2011

Jimmie Giles is a physical shell of the strapping tight end who reached four Pro Bowls in 13 NFL seasons.

The former Tampa Bay Buccaneer standout’s back problems are so severe he has undergone 20 epidural treatments. Doctors fear additional procedures could affect the integrity of Giles’ spinal fluid.

His efforts to avoid major back surgery have coincided with a struggle between the NFL and its players association about health benefits for former players — an issue seized upon by the NFL Alumni Association two years ago when that group began trying to expand its reach from charitable causes to advocacy for the league’s retirees.

But, Giles said, just like the numbing injections he has received to alleviate pain, the NFLAA, under the leadership of former New York Giants great George Martin, has proved equally ineffective in finding a more permanent fix to the problems faced by Giles and some of his peers.

“I don’t know what George’s agenda was,” Giles, 57, recently told FOXSports.com. “If it was to help players, he hasn’t done a very good job.

“He has the commissioner’s ear. He could present things to (NFL Commissioner Roger) Goodell and let him know what’s truly happening to former players. He can show them that the NFL and NFLPA aren’t doing enough to help players who are dealing with disabilities.”

To exclusively blame Martin for the sparring that continues between ailing former players and the NFL about how best to handle post-football health care might not be fair. But a FOXSports.com investigation into Martin’s tenure as NFLAA president and executive director revealed the organization is foundering because of apparent mismanagement.

Among the problems:

• Already facing financial problems before Martin’s hiring in October 2009, the NFLAA continues to struggle despite having received more than $4 million in NFL loans. The most recent was a $1 million loan that kept the NFLAA solvent. Martin oversees the NFLAA’s finances despite having filed for personal bankruptcy three times.

• Some alumni chapters have fallen dormant, creating a trickle-down effect on outreach programs for former players that the NFLAA was supposed to help lead. At least one chapter is thinking about splitting from the NFLAA, which has required more financial support from the chapters and, according to one of them, been slow to distribute reimbursement checks from an NFLAA-controlled fund. The Seattle chapter recently canceled its annual golf tournament, which usually is its top fund-raiser.

• Martin has funneled NFLAA contracts to those close to him, which is a potential violation of the group’s ethics code. Martin’s actions include the donation of NFLAA-allocated Super Bowl tickets to his own nonprofit group run by his son, using the NFLAA brand to promote fund-raising for another Martin-affiliated charity (Journey for 9/11) and tapping an event-planning company run by his wife and daughter-in-law. Another NFLAA executive hired by Martin has entered into a business arrangement with a company controlled by her father.

More on that subject is available here.

Martin declined numerous FOXSports.com requests for a telephone or in-person interview. Via email, Martin defended his NFLAA stewardship and the strides made because of the group’s “tireless advocacy.”

“In its short existence in the modern era, the association has played a critical role in securing a number of important programs and benefits for retired NFL players,” Martin wrote.

Martin, 58, was selected to lead the NFLAA from a list of 140 candidates compiled by a headhunting firm. He was considered a strong candidate because of the public reputation he had built. The loquacious Martin aced a job interview that was conducted after the list was narrowed to about 30 candidates, Lee Nystrom, a former Green Bay Packers center and search-committee member, told FOXSports.com.

Not only was Martin a stalwart defensive end with the Giants (1975-88), he received the NFL Players Association’s highest honor — the Byron “Whizzer” White Award — for “demonstrating outstanding service to one’s team and community” in 1986.

Martin remained active in charitable causes post-football, including his heavily publicized Journey for 9/11 cross-country walk that helped raise about $3 million for New York City rescue workers who began to suffer from respiratory ailments. Martin’s online biography lists business experience with companies that included Tanagraphics and AXA Equitable.

Former Giants linebacker Harry Carson — a Hall of Fame player who cofounded a charity (Minority Athletes Networking) with Martin — campaigned for his former teammate to get the NFLAA job, Nystrom said.

Other retired players involved in the hiring process included Baltimore Colts defensive back Bruce Laird, New York Giants running back Randy Minniear and San Francisco 49ers offensive lineman Ben Lynch.

Shortly after Martin accepted the position, Goodell had him speak on behalf of the NFLAA at a league owners meeting in October 2009.

“I think it’s a great development that George is now in place and running the organization,” Goodell said at a news conference. “I think he will do a terrific job.”

The final NFLAA candidates were supposed to go through a background check, but Nystrom said the committee never knew about Martin’s three bankruptcies. A document produced by headhunting firm Spencer Stuart backs that claim.

According to documents and federal tax records obtained by FOXSports.com, Martin has filed for two Chapter 11 reorganizations and one Chapter 7 liquidation since 1996. The most recent case was not closed until 2005.

In total, Martin sought protection from $416,450 of debt. Martin refused to address the reasons behind the bankruptcies.

“I will only reiterate that this matter is not relevant to (NFLAA) and my background was fully vetted prior to my being hired,” Martin wrote to FOXSports.com.

Without knowledge of Martin’s personal financial issues, the NFLAA gave Martin broad power under a contract offer tendered to him in October 2009. (Martin currently draws a $270,000 salary and is eligible for bonuses that can significantly increase his pay.) The offer sheet obtained by FOXSports.com stated that Martin “will oversee operations, member and partner communication, membership growth and charitable giving and community outreach strategies.” Martin was given “full financial accountability for the organization” as well as responsibility for planning and managing the annual budget.

Martin, though, has struggled to maneuver the organization through expansion of its original mission.

The NFLAA was created as a partnership between two separate groups involved with retired players (NFL Alumni and Fourth and Goal). NFL Alumni originally was formed in 1967 as a Fort Lauderdale, Fla.-based group seeking benefit packages for former players. Nine years later, NFL Alumni became a tax-exempt charity that focused on fund-raising for children and community charities. The group also operated a “dire need” fund for members with financial problems. That fund currently is overseen by a group of NFL owners.

The NFL Alumni’s 15-member board of directors voted to merge with the Fourth and Goal organization headed by Laird. The shift coincided with Frank Krauser’s retirement as NFL Alumni president/CEO in May 2009. Krauser was facing heat because NFL Alumni, according to its own 2009 documents, had allocated an “insufficient amount of funds” to the Dire Needs Trust created to serve as a bridge for applicants without enough money to cover medical costs.

The merger also came amid heavy NFL pressure for NFL Alumni to become an advocacy group for former players as collective-bargaining agreement negotiations began heating up with the NFLPA, which has its own programs for retirees. With more than 3,000 members at that point, the NFL Alumni Association had amassed by far the largest retired player roster of any organization.

Well aware that other advocacy groups and former players, on an individual basis, would seek representation in labor talks and the NFLPA’s own involvement with retired players, the NFL wanted affiliation with an association with which it could build close ties. Goodell said NFL owners “identified the NFL Alumni as the entity they wanted to get behind.”

Goodell also stressed that the NFLAA would be an independent organization, although the league has subsidized the group with funding since its involvement. The vision that the NFLAA would eventually be able to repay the league loans and become self-sustaining hasn’t come to pass.

The NFLAA had $861,520 in cash and short-term investments when Martin took over in 2009. It was in the red at the end of November 2011 and would have fallen more than $1 million in debt by February, internal NFLAA documents show, had the NFL not stepped in with more funding. A document obtained by FOXSports.com details the $2.35 million loans the NFLAA will have received from May 2011 through June 2012, although it does not take into account the most recent $1 million loan made in December, according to a source with knowledge of the transfer. (NFL officials have declined to offer specifics about their financial support of the NFLAA.) The NFLAA also received a $1 million loan soon after its new mandate to aid retired players was launched in 2009.

League affiliation of any sort is a strong point of contention among some retirees who strongly believe the NFL isn’t looking out for their best interests despite the money being funneled toward addressing former player issues.

“As a matter of public record, the NFL has provided funding,” Martin said. “While the funding provided by the NFL was essential in the formation of the association, the NFL has never had or exerted influence over the operations of the organization. The association is overseen exclusively by former NFL players, making it the only established organization that is solely accountable to, managed by and operated in support of retired players.”

The NFL and NFLPA allocated $1 billion in additional benefits toward retired player needs in the new 10-year CBA approved in July 2011. Of that, $620 million is earmarked for a “legacy fund’ that includes pension boosts for qualified retirees, particularly those who played before 1993 without the backing of a CBA. The NFLAA claims it was “instrumental” in pushing for that increase.

Martin was one of more than a half-dozen leaders of retired player groups who met with the league about how the $620 million would be distributed. Martin, though, never became a prominent figure in last summer’s labor talks despite repeated efforts to land a spot at the negotiating table.

Although the program was founded by the NFL, the NFLAA has taken credit for spearheading efforts that established a long-term care insurance program with more than 1,200 applications approved for former players and their wives. Martin wrote that the Transamerica NFL Retiree Long Term Care Insurance Program also has created a streamlined approval process to make everything easier.

However, Nystrom and other former players interviewed by FOXSports.com have seen no evidence of such aid to former players.

Laird and attorney John Hogan, who filed lawsuits on behalf of Giles and other players whose medical claims were denied by the NFL and NFLPA, said they pitched Martin in July 2010 about having the NFLAA provide members with detailed information about how to apply for benefits. Laird and Hogan said that, despite Martin’s initial interest, such an initiative and a proposed disability advisory committee never materialized.

“He loved it,” Laird said of Martin. “He asked John to get attorneys across the country involved to help these former players. Then nothing. Weeks then months went by and nothing ever happened.”

Martin called the efforts by Laird and Hogan “valuable,” but the NFLAA decided it was more advantageous to lobby for more benefits in the league’s collective bargaining agreement.

Among his accomplishments, Martin points to the NFL Alumni Career and Business program, which, he said, has been accessed by more than 50 retired players. The NFLAA also recently completed an “NFL 12 days of Christmas” initiative where some disadvantaged veterans received up to $1,000 from the dire needs fund.

Martin said the NFLAA has further aided retirees, although he refused to offer specific examples citing the group’s privacy policy.

No matter what Martin has accomplished, Nystrom said there are some retirees who will feel it isn’t enough. That is based upon the belief the NFL and NFLPA owes them big for building the game into an industry now generating more than $10 billion in annual revenue with an even rosier financial outlook.

“I’m not sure that’s a battle that can be won,” said Nystrom, 60, who spent two seasons (1972-73) with the Packers. “No matter how much money you throw at it, it will never be enough for certain people.”

Nystrom cites the fact that about half of the NFL’s roughly 13,000 retired players are vested (four credited seasons before 1993; three credited seasons after 1993).

“When you give a dollar to a non-vested player, you are taking a dollar away from the vested player,” Nystrom said. “There’s just no good answer.”

The fact that Martin appears to have used his NFLAA office to benefit family members and his outside charity endeavors adds further fuel to the fire. Retired players advocate Dave Pear already was critical of Martin’s job performance before told about his potential conflict of interest.

“George Martin hasn’t done squat except take care of himself and those around him,” said Pear, a former Oakland Raiders defensive lineman who has undergone almost a dozen surgeries since he retired after the 1981 Super Bowl.

Another major concern for Martin: declining NFLAA membership. There were 3,015 former NFL players enrolled in 2010, a drop of 747 members from 2006. Martin told FOXSports.com that membership stands at “3,500 retired NFL players,” although several people close to the NFLAA who were interviewed by FOXSports.com questioned that total.

One of those players no longer part of NFLAA membership is retired quarterback Dan Pastorini. He has refused to sign a “group licensing agreement” (GLA) that would allow the NFLAA to market his image. The NFLAA has cited the GLA and need for mass number of retirees, especially prominent former players, to sign the agreement as a critical part of its fund-raising plan for financial independence from the NFL.

“I was kind of shocked by that,” Pastorini told FOXSports.com. “I wanted to pay my dues, even though I don’t agree with a lot of things Martin is trying to do. I still wanted to remain a member in good standing. What’s his motivation? Maybe you have to look at who’s paying his salary: the NFL.”

Martin wrote that the NFLAA has reached out to Pastorini and said agreeing to the GLA is not required. He added the organization has altered the website to make that clarification.

Although exact membership dues totals were not available for 2011, the NFLAA collected $80,432 in dues from May 2011 through September 2011, according to a document sent to the board of directors in November and obtained by FOXSports.com. The NFLAA had projected to raise $137,820 during that same period.

Multiple sources confirmed to FOXSports.com that the lower totals are the result of a dip in the membership of about 1,000. With the $100 annual membership fee, that translates to a loss of $100,000.

In the organization’s 2010 fourth-quarter report issued that November, Martin claimed that “close to 500 (new) players” each year become NFL Alumni members. But the NFLAA acknowledged membership problems in a business plan sent to its local chapters in early 2011. An internal document obtained by FOXSports.com states, “There has been a noticeable and steady decline over the past four years.”

Not all documents obtained showed grim financial forecasts.

An accounting firm (Rothstein Kass) that audited the NFLAA’s finances produced a review showing the group would nearly triple its revenue to $5.89 million in 2011. Large spikes in membership dues and revenue made from golf tournaments and Super Bowl-related events were projected.

The true numbers are hardly as rosy.

A spreadsheet sent to board members in early November 2011 details losses of $151,685 from May through September. The organization projects an overall loss of $1.37 million for 2011 — a figure that would have been more than double were it not for NFL assistance.

The NFLAA doesn’t expect an immediate change in fortune, as it projects losses of $798,271 in the first six months of 2012. The NFL has made another $1 million loan in recent weeks that is basically keeping the organization afloat.

“Our commitment to retired players includes loans, grants or commitments of funding, to several organizations that provide programs and services to former NFL players,” the NFL wrote in a statement to FOXSports.com. “Those groups include the NFL Player Care Foundation, Pro Football Hall of Fame, Gay Culverhouse Player Outreach Program, Mike Ditka’s Gridiron Greats, the Satcher Health Leadership Institute at the Morehouse School of Medicine, the NFL Players Association, and the NFL Alumni Association. The operations of these organizations are overseen by their own boards. We review our funding commitments and make adjustments as necessary.”

The organization would have effectively gone broke last month, according to the document. By the end of November 2011, the cash balance in NFLAA accounts was projected to dip into negative territory by about $256,748. (It had reported $313,888 in cash in September and was projected to have $116,978 cash on hand in October.) By June 2012, the NFLAA had predicted, it would be $1,118,365 in debt before the most recent NFL loan infusion.

Other Internal NFLAA documents obtained by FOXSports.com acknowledged those revenue streams — including the GLA licensing and arranging speeches for former players — haven’t come to fruition, and NFL loans are being used to subsidize operations. The NFLAA’s financial problems have continued despite an 8 percent reduction in workforce in 2010, according to last year’s fourth-quarter report. There currently are 12 full-time NFLAA employees.

The NFLAA’s expenses — which include everything from staging golf tournaments to salaries — were projected at $5.39 million for 2011. That’s $1,862,537 more than the expenses from 2009, according to the most recent IRS tax form available.

NFLAA revenue — minus the money from the NFL — was projected at just $245,715 more in 2011 than in 2009.

“The NFL Alumni Association has yet to establish a revenue stream outside of the draw-down of those funds from the (NFL) loan,” the internal report stated.

According to minutes published online from a May 2011 meeting of the NFLAA’s Southern California chapter (18), each chapter is required to pay a $5,000 fee.

“Nothing comes back to the local chapters,” the minutes state. “The NFLAA has borrowed $2.5 million from the owners to continue to function. This loan has to be paid back starting in 2014.”

Nystrom said such demands, coupled with the NFLAA’s crumbling finances, have him thinking about removing the Minnesota chapter from the NFLAA’s umbrella. About five years ago, the NFLAA assumed control of the banking activities for each chapter. Monies raised, mostly through golf tournaments, were deposited into an account controlled by the NFLAA. In turn, those chapters would request payments to fund local charities and pay expenses.

In recent months, Nystrom said, checks have been slow to arrive despite numerous requests.

“The money is supposed to be kept in a separate account, but some of us are worried what will become of the fund if there’s a bankruptcy (involving the NFLAA)” Nystrom said.

Further troubles are emanating from the NFLAA’s new headquarters in Newark, NJ. The group lists 24 local chapters, but some are currently dormant. That has made reaching retired players all the more difficult.

In 2010, under a program touted by Martin to FOXSports.com, the NFLAA partnered with the Morehouse School of Medicine to assist former players seeking medical care. The NFLAA agreed to supply logistical support from each chapter to notify retirees and get them to seminars.

Morehouse had conducted 14 presentations around the nation through mid-November. Morehouse spokesman Chris Thrasher said they had to go it alone in a few cities already.

“Obviously, one of our main goals was to get as many former players as we can get to these events,” Thrasher said. “When there is no chapter or active chapter, it makes things more difficult. It’s then up to us to reach out to these guys. We try to find the movers and shakers in the area so they can get in contact with the former players.”

Speakers from the NFLAA-affiliated Gay Culverhouse Players Outreach Program and NFL Player Care foundation attended the NFLAA’s Southern California chapter meeting in May. The online minutes describe the turnout of NFLAA members as “disappointing” and list ways of trying to increase membership, such as organizing parties and a get-together at a Major League Baseball game.

Disappointment also best describes how Giles feels toward the NFLAA.

“I went to George Martin when he first started and I said, `George, I need your help,’ ” Giles said. “I never heard back from him. If you are there to help people, help people — even if it’s just one guy at a time.”
 

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/NFLAA-president-George-Martin-investigation-financial-questions-012412

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Retired overweight NFL players might have more cognitive problems

By Jeannine Stein, Los Angeles Times / For the Booster Shots blog

January 17, 2012, 2:20 p.m.
Retired football players who are overweight could be at greater risk for cognitive problems compared to normal-weight former players, a study finds.

Football players might have the health deck stacked against them in other ways, since they’re also at risk for brain injury from concussions. Add obesity into the mix and it may up the ante even more. Other studies have shown a link between obesity and cognitive impairment.

Researchers analyzed data in two groups: 38 retired NFL players who were at a healthy weight and 38 retired players who were overweight. In both groups the average age of the players was 58.

All study participants were given a series of neuropsychological exams that measured such things as information processing speed, reasoning, reaction time and general cognitive function. They were also given tests that measured blood flow in the brain to see if certain areas were not getting enough blood.

The overweight players had substantially more reductions in blood flow in the prefrontal cortex and the temporal pole compared to normal-weight players. Those areas affect reasoning, executive function, emotion, behavior and attention. Those who were overweight also did more poorly on the neuropsychological exams compared to their normal-weight peers.

“In addition to the obvious risk factors from playing contact sports,” the authors wrote, “the additive impact of having excess body mass increases the propensity for further metabolic and neurological complications.”

They added that the combination of higher incidence of obesity and cardiovascular risk factors among former NFL players suggest there could be long-lasting effects on brain health, including complications from chronic traumatic encephalopathy, a neurological condition that can cause brain degeneration as well as symptoms such as anxiety, slow reaction time, depression, aggression, loss of memory and confusion.

Athletes’ health might benefit, the authors added, through education about how to manage their weight.

The study was published online Tuesday in the journal Translational Psychiatry.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Weeb Ewbank’s wife, Lucy, dies at 105 in Ohio

Husband coached the Baltimore Colts from 1954-1962

Baltimore Sun staff
9:17 a.m. EST, January 18, 2012

Lucy Ewbank, wife of former Baltimore Colts coach Weeb Ewbank, died Monday in at The Knolls of Oxford (Ohio). She was 105. Her husband died in 1998.

He coached the Colts from 1954 to 1962, winning championships in 1958 and 1959. He also coached the New York Jets. He went into the Pro Football Hall of Fame in 1978.

According to a news release from Miami University in Oxford, where her husband was an athlete and coach, Mrs. Ewbank is survived by her daughters; Luanne Spenceley, Nancy (Charles) Winner, Jan Hudson; 8 grandchildren, 22 great grandchildren and 6 great great grandchildren.

A memorial service will be held Jan. 21 at 11 a.m. at the Ogle & Paul R. Young Funeral Home in Oxford. In lieu of flowers, the family suggests donations to the Knolls of Oxford Benevolent Fund, Knolls of Oxford Employee fund or Vitas Hospice. Condolences may be sent online to www.smithoglefuneralhome.com.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Community Huddle: Taking a goal line stand on your mind and body

ATTENTION:

All retired players and their families and friends are invited to this event. Spread the word!

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Bills great Kent Hull is dead at age 50

By Mark Gaughn – Buffalo News, posted October 18, 2011

Kent Hull, shown here receiving an award following his retirement, was considered one of the Bills' all-time greatest offensive linemen.

Kent Hull, one of the best players in the Buffalo Bills’ Super Bowl era and one of the
strongest leaders the team ever has seen, has died at age 50.

Hull apparently suffered a heart attack in his hometown of Greenwood, Miss. A family friend at his home could not confirm that this evening.

Hull is the greatest center who ever played for the Bills. He anchored the Bills’ offensive line from 1986 to 1996 and was one of the most important members of the Bills’ no-huddle offense, making all of the line’s blocking adjustments for quarterback Jim Kelly.

A three-time Pro Bowler, Hull was inducted onto the Bills’ Wall of Fame in 2002. He was inducted into the Greater Buffalo Sports Hall of Fame in 1997.

“Of all 47 years of my coaching career, this was one of the most memorable guys I ever had the honor to coach,” said Bills Hall of Fame coach Marv Levy. “I’m so sad to hear it. He was a great leader, certainly. He was as likable a guy as you could meet, family-oriented, a great citizen. I’m stunned.”

“He was bigger than life, and I don’t think he really got his just due, even though he went to some Pro Bowls,” said Bills great receiver Andre Reed. “He was one of the best.”

“Kent was a soft-spoken guy, and he was one of the smartest guys I ever met, too,” Reed said. “I’m sad for his family, and all the people who knew him. He’s going to be missed as a friend.”

“Everybody genuflected to Kent Hull,” former Bills General Manager Bill Polian told The News in 2002. “People don’t realize what a leader he was on that team. When Kent spoke and took a stand, the debate was over. Everybody shut up and followed Kent.”

Hull played college football at Mississippi State and began his pro career in 1983 with the New Jersey Generals of the upstart United States Football League. When the USFL folded, Polian signed him to a Bills contract, and he arrived in Buffalo the same day as Kelly — Aug. 18, 1986.

By coincidence, Hull’s plane arrived in Buffalo 45 minutes ahead of Kelly’s. Kelly rode in a limousine from the airport to a downtown news conference. Hull rode right behind in an equipment van.

“The way I like to describe it is, Jim rode in on a limo and I rode in on a load of pumpkins,” Hull once said.

That was probably the last time he took a back seat with the Bills. He played 189 games over the next 11 seasons, including four Super Bowls. He missed only two games in his Bills career.

Hull, at 6-foot-5 and 285 pounds, brought great athleticism, long arms and natural strength to the center position. But his greatest asset was his sharp mind and knowledge of the game.

“Even Dermontti Dawson said to me Kent was a great, great football player, and Dermontti is going to be in the Hall of Fame soon,” said Reed, referring to Pittsburgh’s dominant center of the 1990s.

“Jim Kelly was the master,” former Bills offensive coordinator and line coach Tom Bresnahan told The News in 2002. “But if he hadn’t had Hull, he couldn’t have run the no-huddle as well. The reason is, we went so fast, especially in the early days when the defenses didn’t understand us. Only a man of football genius, like Kent, could have responded to the calls Jim was making and made his own calls in the limited time available.”

Hull made the Pro Bowl in 1989, 1990 and 1991. The Bills’ offense ranked in the top six in the NFL in yards gained for five straight years, from 1989 to 1993. The Bills were the top-scoring team in the league in 1990 and the top-rushing team in the league in 1991 and 1992.

In his retirement, Hull ran a family farm in Greenwood, Miss, that spanned about 2,500 acres and included about 700 head of cattle.

He is survived by his wife, Kay, and two children, Drew and Ellen.

mgaughan@buffnews.comnull

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 3 Comments

NFL players gave up key “publicity rights” in new CBA

By Jeff Nixon,  posted October 17, 2011

While the new CBA continues to give the NFL the right to use active player images, names and likenesses to publicize and promote NFL football while they are still actively playing, there is some new language that was inserted into the agreement that could have a profound effect on the active player’s publicity rights when they eventually join the ranks of the retired.

The language states: “For purposes of clarity, the foregoing grant of rights includes the right and authority to use, and to authorize affiliates or business partners to use, after the term of this Agreement any Publicity Rights fixed in a tangible medium (e.g. filmed, photographed, recorded or otherwise captured) during the term of this Agreement, any right or authority solely for the purposes described herein.”

Do the active players understand what that means?

By signing their player contract, the active players have now given the NFL the right to sell their NFL game performances in any and all media without having to compensate them after they retire from the NFL.

Not only did the NFLPA and active players give up these property rights, but they allowed new language to be inserted into their contracts that gave away the right to sue or contest the NFL’s use of certain property rights even after the term of the agreement:

“Player and National Football League Players Association, including any of its affiliates (“NFLPA”) do not and will not contest during or after the term of the Agreement, and this hereby confirms their acknowledgement of, exclusive rights of the League, Club and any NFL member club(i) to telecast, broadcast, or otherwise distribute, transmit or perform, on a live, delayed, or archived basis, in any and all media now known or hereafter developed, any NFL games or any excerpts thereof and (ii) to produce, license, offer for sale, market, or otherwise distribute or perform (or authorize a third-party to do any of the foregoing), on a live, delayed, or archived basis, any NFL games or any excerpts thereof, in any and all media now known or hereafter developed, including, but not limited to, packaged or other electronic or digital media.” 

So there it is in a nutshell.  The NFLPA and active players have given away any chance they may have had to receive a fair share of the money the NFL generates from selling the archived footage of their performances in NFL games, or any excerpts of those games after they retire.

The real irony of this story is that NFLPA Executive Director DeMaurice Smith complained about the fact that the NFL owners did not pay retired players for their Legacy. Here is what he said in a June 7, 2010 SB Nation interview: “So I know individual teams sell legacy. My problem is they don’t pay [retired players] for it. And because no team pays for that legacy while they’re selling it, I think if you’re a star running back for your local team and your local team continues to use your name and picture, put it on the wall and basically tells fans to buy tickets for that history, that legacy, that player. You [the NFL] don’t pay that player anything.”   

DeMaurice Smith made that statement and then turned around and negotiated a CBA that takes away some key publicity rights that current players could potentially be paid for when they retire.

Was there some quid pro quo for doing this? It’s hard for me to believe that the NFLPA would give away these key publicity rights without receiving something in return. There were substantial increases in active player benefits over the term of the agreement, so maybe that was the trade-off.

Was it worth the price they paid?    

The NFL and NFL Films have made hundreds of millions off the sale of films, videos and dvd’s that have captured player’s performances over the past 50 years. I wrote about this in an article entitled – The NFL Legacy: Created in our image. The money from the sale of digital media will continue to grow and grow but the current players made a decision to forego the possibility of ever getting a piece of that property rights pie.

In contrast to what the active players have done, it is important to know that retired players never gave away their publicity rights and that is why there is a series of Class Action lawsuits  currently working their way through the courts.

The retired NFL players allege that the NFL, including its NFL Films division, has – and continues – to use retired players’ identities to promote the league and earn substantial revenues without consent from the players.

“There is no dispute that these videos promote the NFL,” said Bob Stein, a former NFL player and attorney representing the players. “This suit is on behalf of thousands of players who want nothing more than to obtain their fair share of the revenues the NFL has earned, and the brand it has built due to their contributions. This is especially current with the growth of distribution channels such as the NFL network and worldwide internet marketing.”

It is interesting to note that when the new standard player contract language was revised to give away the active player’s publicity rights even after the term of the agreement, they did not use the words “in perpetuity” which is the standard language used in most contracts to mean “forever.” I believe that was purposely done as defensive strategy against the aforementioned lawsuits. The NFL has used the term “in perpetuity” in many other contracts, but unfortunately for them, they never used it in the previous standard player contracts, so instead they said “For purposes of clarity” to imply that it was always their intent to retain these publicity rights into perpetuity. 

While it might be clear to them, it was never clear to retired players – and it won’t be clear to the court or a jury that hears this case. The fact that the NFL and NFLPA put this new language in the new CBA may even help the retired player case, because it shows how they are now closing the legal door on player publicity rights after they have retired.    

While retired players continue to fight to protect their publicity rights and get paid a fair share of the revenue that has been generated over the past 50 years, the NFLPA and the active players just made the mistake of giving their’s away in what I believe was an exchange for more “money now” in the new CBA agreement.

I think the NFL knows that former players have a very good publicity rights class action lawsuit against them and that is why they negotiated the future “publicity rights” away from the active players in this new CBA. They don’t want this to be an ongoing problem. 

The owners know that at some point down the road they may have to come to a large monetary settlement with former players. They don’t want the current players following us down that road, so they set up a detour. That detour probably led the active players to a quick pot of gold, but they gave up some important publicity rights to get it.

Will the active players come to regret their short-sighted decision in the future?

If retired players win their class action lawsuit and start receiving royalties, or a share of the proceeds that were generated from the sale of our images, the active players may start to second guess their decision. 

While we all await the outcome of the Class Action lawsuit, you can always go to the Hulu website and watch some of the greatest games ever played – the retired player “Legacy” now captured in digital format into perpetuity! 

I wonder how much Hulu paid the NFL to use our images?  

We already know how much we got paid!

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

Statement from Fourth & Goal President Bruce Laird on the passing of Patricia Modell

Patricia and Art Modell

Mahatma Gandhi once said, “Man can never be a woman’s equal in the spirit of selfless service withwhich nature has endowed her.” A gracious and generous woman, Pat Modell wasthe epitome of selfless service in the community, in the league and in the home.  She was the rock on whom Art Modell depended. She was vocal in her support of retired NFL players, at a time when far too many remained silent.

Pat Modell’s legacy will live on in the organizations she supported, in the memories she left and in the family she loved. Our thoughts and prayers are with Art, the Modell family and the Baltimore Ravens.

Bruce Laird
President, Fourth & Goal
Baltimore Colts, 1972-1981
San Diego Chargers,1982-1983

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Finalizing the Legacy Fund benefit for former NFL players

In a recent article I wrote and posted on Fourth and Goal, I made the following statement: 

“If the NFLPA expects the NFL to send them a counter proposal, they may be waiting until hell freezes over. This is a negotiating process and I doubt the League is going to put out one specific counter proposal. The NFL has several proposals they would like to discuss with the Union, but unless the NFLPA comes to the table, this thing could drag on for quite some time.”

I could be wrong, but I don’t think the NFL wants to get into a public negotiating process with the NFLPA by sending counter proposals back and forth. I think the NFL would prefer to sit down face-to-face with Union officials and their former player reps and negotiate the best distribution method possible, but only after taking into account ALL retired player suggestions and recommendations.  

When the NFLPA was negotiating with the NFL – before and after the lockout – both sides agreed that they would not divulge the substance of their discussions. Why should our benefit negotiations be any different? 

It is my understanding that the League is still collecting retired player suggestions and recommendations on how to distribute the Legacy benefit and has set a deadline of October 3rd (today) to receive that information. Hopefully, the NFLPA will be prepared to meet with the NFL as soon as possible. 

This time the NFLPA might want to consider bringing Jim McFarland to the meeting since he was elected by the NFLPA Former Player Chapter membership to represent them at the table.  Jim was noticeably missing from the NFLPA’s list of representatives that were scheduled to attend the NFL’s September 15th meeting. As you know, the NFLPA did not attend that meeting because Carl Eller was invited.

Ever since Jim McFarland stated his objections to the way the NFLPA was proposing to distribute the Legacy Benefit, it appears that DeMaurice Smith has added his name to the Gene Upshaw blacklist.

If that is how the NFLPA treats its own elected former player representative, then what does that say about their pledge to give former players a “voice” at the table? 

Was it all just empty rhetoric designed to keep former players quiet while the NFLPA took us to the cleaners?

I would like to point out that the NFLPA’s proposal is quite different from what DeMaurice Smith was “selling” retired players last year. 

In a June 7, 2010 SB Nation interview, Mr. Smith said So I’ve said every team should make a contribution of at least a million dollars a year for a total of $32 million a year for what I would call the legacy fund. That legacy fund should go to all the player’s pensions who played prior to 1993 and that would increase all their pensions by, get this, $1,000 per month.” 

As it turns out, the NFL and NFLPA agreed to put almost twice as much – $62 million annually – into the Legacy fund, so by Mr. Smith’s calculations shouldn’t all pre-1993 players be getting almost a $2,000 per month increase in their pensions? This would actually be more in line with the formal resolution that was unanimously adopted at the NFLPA convention in Maui last year. 

I have to assume that Mr. Smith had some actuarial consultants advise him before he made that SB Nation interview statement. He should have been able to find a few good pension advisers with the approximately $11 million in staff operating costs they have in their annual budget.  

If you read the NFLPA’s Legacy Fund proposal, you will discover that a majority of former players will be receiving a monthly pension increase that is significantly lower than $1,000. 

Based on what DeMaurice Smith said, $2,000 should be the “floor.” Unfortunately many former players are being shown nothing but the door!

Under the NFLPA’s proposal for distributing the Legacy benefit you will need at least 9 years (credited seasons) to get a $1,000 monthly payment.    

Maybe during the discovery phase of the Retired Player Class Action lawsuit against the NFLPA we will find out what really happened to the Pension and Legacy Fund benefit increases we were promised.  

Posted in Uncategorized | 12 Comments

Current NFL stars forgetting about past heroes is disgraceful

By
CBSSports.com National Columnist   Sep. 15, 2011  

Elvin Bethea (left), inducted into the Hall of Fame in 2003, calls himself 'one of the lucky ones.' (Getty Images)

If what I’m hearing is true, the NFL is full of snakes and scoundrels. If what I’m hearing is true, NFL players are a despicable bunch, and for the sake of this story I’m not talking about the criminals and killers in the league today. For the sake of this story I’m talking about the leaders, the best of the best, the players who are the face of the NFL. Drew Brees, Tom Brady and Peyton Manning. I’m talking about men like that.

And I’ll say this: What I’m hearing? I believe it is true. I believe it with all my broken heart.

My heart breaks for men like Earl Campbell and Elvin Bethea, crumbling men who gave their health to the NFL and have in return been given a middle finger from the current players.

What I’m hearing isn’t from some unnamed source who is afraid to dish this dirt in public. It isn’t conjecture or theory. It’s a statement of fact — spoken, and in legal documents — from an attorney in Washington, D.C., who represents the 28 former NFL players who filed a class-action lawsuit in federal court Tuesday against the NFLPA and a handful of individuals, including Brady and union president DeMaurice Smith.

Of those 28 former players who put their names to the lawsuit, 23 are Hall of Famers – household names like Eller and Lilly, Marchetti and Bednarik. Leroy Kelly. Charley Taylor. Don Maynard. Mel Renfro. Names like that. Legends.

Their attorney, Michael Hausfeld, broke down their lawsuit with some numbers that are so astonishing, so awful, it made my skin crawl.

“Here’s some basic math,” Hausfeld told me Wednesday, providing one of many heartbreaking facts from the 52-page court filing. “The league said [during labor negotiations earlier this year], ‘Reduce rookie salaries by $300 million a year. Split that between active players and retired players. That means $150 million for retired players every year for 10 years. That’s $1.5 billion over 10 years. In addition, there was a pledge for roughly $50 million toward the annual Legacy Fund. So that’s a total of $200 million a year — times 10 years, that’s $2 billion. “[But] after the players were finished negotiating with the league [in July], retirees only got $700 million over 10 years. Where did the other $1.3 billion go?”

Hall of Fame defensive end Elvin Bethea, one of the 28 plaintiffs against the NFLPA, has a pretty good idea.

“The current players,” Bethea said, “kept it for themselves.”

Chilling. Heartbreaking. Infuriating. Pick your adjective, and that’s it. That’s Drew Brees and Tom Brady and Peyton Manning and the rest of the NFLPA’s leaders, shortsighted men who — if what I’m hearing is true — used the latest labor negotiations to cram more money into their bulging pockets rather than give it to the men who made their wealth possible.

A man like Curt Marsh, the Raiders’ No. 1 pick in 1981 who played six years and has undergone more than 20 surgeries, many on his right foot. But no more on that foot, because that sucker’s gone. Amputated. Football injury. How is Curt Marsh paying for those procedures? Damned if I know, but he’s not using NFL insurance because it doesn’t exist. Not for retired players.

“The day I retired in 1983, my insurance retired too,” Bethea says. “No health coverage. No disability. No nothing.”

The NFL and NFLPA have rectified some of that, allowing for disability for former players. Hausfeld and Bethea want to be clear on this: The NFLPA didn’t simply abandon them. In the latest CBA, the NFLPA increased the amount of funds directed toward retired players — but what the NFLPA did was slap a chintzy band-aid on this spurting wound. Picture a rich banker walking past a former colleague, now impoverished, and throwing three nickels at him. As if that’s going to help.

“That [$50 million annual] Legacy Fund contribution I mentioned earlier? [Active] players’ contribution to that is roughly $15 million a year — out of revenue to the players of a minimum of $4.5 billion annually,” Hausfeld said. “That’s less than ½ of 1 percent. That’s your context here.”

That’s monstrous, and disability payments aren’t exactly easy for retired players to get. According to the lawsuit filed Tuesday, barely half the retirees who filed for disability in 2010 received anything in return. And of the more than 10,000 former NFL players, the plaintiffs say, “it is estimated that less than 300 have received long-term disability payments.”

A guy like Mike Webster, the former Steelers center, was so battered that he ended up tormented, homeless, dead at 50. Colts tight end John Mackey’s dementia was such that he would turn on the television in the years before his death in July at 69, watch the Colts game and get angry when he realized that the guy wearing No. 88 wasn’t John Mackey. Oilers running back Earl Campbell once ran over linebackers, but now he rides along in a wheelchair, three vertebra removed from his back, his knees ruined, a drooping foot unresponsive. Defensive backs Dave Duerson and Andre Waters committed suicide, neither older than 50, both suffering from chronic traumatic encephalopathy — a fancy way of saying their brains had been bashed in during football.

Those are not low-profile stories. Those players were legends, heroes and John Mackey in particular was the first president of the NFLPA. I would say this is galling, but galling doesn’t begin to cover it.

“Disgraceful,” is how Hausfeld puts it, and I’ll defer to the attorney here. Because he’s right. Retired players are dying miserable deaths, guilty of bad timing, having played this violent sport in an era when concussions weren’t understood, injuries weren’t nurtured and salaries weren’t enormous.

“They were guinea pigs,” Hausfeld said.

I called the NFLPA for their side, and communications director Carl Francis called back to say he had no comment. Wait a minute, I said. What about these numbers from Hausfeld and the lawsuit — what about the current players basically negotiating retired players out of hundreds of millions of dollars in benefits?

“I can’t confirm that,” Francis said. “I don’t know.”

OK, fine. But here’s what we do know. We know that a guy like Elvin Bethea, a future Hall of Famer, was paid so poorly in the 1970s that he had to work in the offseason for a big-and-tall clothing store before catching on with Anheuser-Busch as a salesman. He kept that job after he retired from the NFL, giving him the insurance benefits to pay for his 13 operations. He remembers one time a hospital bill for $93,000 came to his house after knee surgery. The insurance company paid for it, but the memory shakes Bethea still.

“What about the players who didn’t have a job like I had after they retired [from the NFL]?” he says. “A lot of guys couldn’t find that kind of work. A lot of guys couldn’t work. I was one of the lucky ones.”

That’s one way of looking at it. Brees offered another perspective, suggesting that people like Bethea were the smart ones, and the rest — those who couldn’t afford their surgeries — were irresponsible beggars. This is what Brees said in 2009 about retired NFL players, according to the lawsuit filed Tuesday:

“There’s some guys out there that have made bad business decisions,” Brees said. “They took their pensions early because they never went out and got a job. They’ve had a couple divorces and they’re making payments to this place and that place. And that’s why they don’t have money. And they’re coming to us to basically say, ‘Please make up for my bad judgment.’”

That was Drew Brees, nearing the final year of a $60 million contract, judging players from the Elvin Bethea era. As a rookie, Bethea made $15,000.

Today he can’t hold a gallon of milk. His wrists hurt too bad. Then again, after all his knee and back surgeries, he can’t stand for more than a minute or two. So when would he have time to hold the milk? And Elvin Bethea says he’s one of the lucky ones.

“I am,” he says. “I really am.”

God help the unlucky ones.

The NFLPA won’t.

Posted in Uncategorized | 34 Comments

Why was the NFLPA a “No Show” for NFL meeting on Legacy Fund?

In a September 14, 2011 email, Nolan Harrison III explained why the NFLPA representatives did not attend the meeting last Thursday by saying “As many of you know, Cornelius Bennett, Tom DePaso and myself were going to attend a meeting tomorrow in New York with Goodell to speak about the Legacy Benefit. Due to the Eller II law suit being filed against the NFLPA today, council has advised us not to attend as one of the named plaintiffs will be in attendance. This is unfortunate timing as we are all wanting to complete the bargaining session with the NFL so that we can implement the Legacy benefit which has been delayed for the past four weeks. At the conclusion of the meeting the NFLPA intends to request that the NFL responds with a counter proposal and timeline so that we can get this benefit into your hands as soon as possible.”

The “named” plantiff that Mr. Harrison was referring to was Carl Eller. As you know, Carl and many other Hall of Fame players have filed a class action lawsuit against the NFLPA. You can read the Class Action Court Document at the bottom of this article. 

The NFLPA was not only a “no show” for the meeting, but on top of that they had the audacity to blame the NFL for delaying the final passage of the Legacy Fund benefit. Indirectly, they are also blaming Carl Eller and the other Hall of Famers because they had the nerve to file a lawsuit against them.

Heaven forbid the NFLPA should sit across the table from someone that is suing them!

On the other hand, the NFL had no problem sitting down with Tom Brady, Drew Brees and Mike Vrabel when those players were actively suing them – and making decisions on how retired player benefits should be funded.

If the NFLPA had bothered to ask, I think the League negotiators would have met with them separately, either before or after the meeting they had with Bruce Laird, Carl Eller, Willie Lanier, George Martin and Ron Mix. By doing so, they could have reduced the length of time it would have taken to resolve this issue.

Apparently, the NFLPA is perfectly content with the proposal they submitted to the NFL, even though Jim McFarland, one of the key “elected” representatives for NFLPA former player members has voiced several objections to the way the NFLPA is proposing to distribute the funding.

It is interesting to note that Jim McFarland was not among the NFLPA reps that were listed to meet with the NFL. I guess the NFLPA didn’t want the potential embarrassment of having their own former player rep sitting at the table disagreeing with their proposal.

Although I don’t always see eye-to-eye with Jim, I will always have great admiration for his decision to speak out about the Legacy Fund and provide additional recommendations on how it should be allocated.

The reason Commissioner Goodell called for a meeting with former players is simple – he wanted to get as much input from them as he possibly could.

It is important for all retired players to remember this one very important fact: The NFLPA does not have the “exclusive” right to bargain on behalf of retired players. The Commissioner knows full well that the NFLPA does not represent all retired players, so he reached out to some prominent retired player advocates to get some additional advice and recommendations on the distribution of the Legacy benefit.

I know there are guys out there that will question why the NFL Commissioner chose the former players that he did, but I for one am satisfied that he had the right people at the table. Whether the NFLPA or NFL choose to listen to the advice of those former players is another story.

So now that the NFLPA has acted like a spoiled child and has taken their ball home with them, when will they come back out and play?

If they haven’t already done so, the NFL and the NFLPA need to schedule a meeting today and get the Legacy benefit issue ironed out. If the NFLPA expects the NFL to send them a counter proposal, they may be waiting until hell freezes over.  This is a negotiating process and I doubt the League is going to put out one specific counter proposal. The NFL has several proposals they would like to discuss with the Union, but unless the NFLPA comes to the table, this thing could drag on for quite some time.

After they come to an agreement, the NFLPA can sit back and slap themselves on the back for another successful “shell game” where they left retired players wondering where the ball went.

The fact is, the ball was never under the shell to begin with……it was in their pocket (and the active player pockets) from the start of the game.

If Carl Eller and the Hall of Fame players are successful in their litigation on behalf of retired players, we just might get a chance to see where the ball went during the “discovery phase” of the trial.

Hopefully, the Carl Eller lawsuit can expose some of the inequities in the distribution of retired player benefits, along with the inherent conflict of interest that was taking place when the union was decertified (but still acting like a union) and the active players were – wink wink – helping us out.

Just for the record, here is what Carl Eller and the former players involved in the Eller I litigation team proposed for retired player benefits via the Pension Plan: 

Pension Fund Settlement Proposal

I. Pension

A. Benefit Increase

We propose the following Benefit Credit enhancements under The Bert Bell/Pete Roselle NFL Player Retirement Plan (the “Retirement Plan”):

Credited Season Current Benefit Credit    Proposed Benefit Credit*

Before 1982                $250                                        $500

1982 through 1992     $255                                        $505

1993 and 1994            $265                                         $515

1995 and 1996            $315                                          $565

1997                             $365                                          $615

1998 and later           $470                                           $650

* Proposed Benefit Credit increases will be effective July 1, 2011 for all Retirement Plan participants, whether or not the participant has commenced distribution of his pension benefit. The Proposed Benefit Credit will be subject to the same adjustments for retirement before or after Normal Retirement Date and for optional forms of payment that are in the current Retirement Plan.

Proposed Cost:

At the June 6, 2011 meeting the NFL reps said Aon Hewitt estimated the liability attributable to this proposal to be approximately $1.3 billion. Based on the 2010 valuation interest rate of 7.25% and a 15 year amortization schedule, this translates into annual funding payments of approximately $150 million.

B. Vesting Enhancements:

We propose the following vesting enhancements under the Retirement Plan:

Current vesting is determined as follows (with certain disability and other exceptions):

(a) five Credited Seasons (for pre-1974 players)

(b) four Credited Seasons (for players who play after 1973)

(c) three Credited Seasons (for players who play after 1992)

Proposed new vesting schedule:

Aon Hewitt has not yet provided us the data to fully price out these proposals. However, at the aforementioned June 6th meeting, the NFL reps said there were 378 former players who had three Credited Seasons but not four Credited Seasons when vesting was reduced to four credited seasons. The NFL reps said the liability attributable to vesting these former players was $49.9 million. Based on the 2010 valuation interest rate of 7.25% and a 15 year amortization schedule, this translates into annual funding payments of approximately $5.5 million.

Posted in Uncategorized | 15 Comments