Retired overweight NFL players might have more cognitive problems

By Jeannine Stein, Los Angeles Times / For the Booster Shots blog

January 17, 2012, 2:20 p.m.
Retired football players who are overweight could be at greater risk for cognitive problems compared to normal-weight former players, a study finds.

Football players might have the health deck stacked against them in other ways, since they’re also at risk for brain injury from concussions. Add obesity into the mix and it may up the ante even more. Other studies have shown a link between obesity and cognitive impairment.

Researchers analyzed data in two groups: 38 retired NFL players who were at a healthy weight and 38 retired players who were overweight. In both groups the average age of the players was 58.

All study participants were given a series of neuropsychological exams that measured such things as information processing speed, reasoning, reaction time and general cognitive function. They were also given tests that measured blood flow in the brain to see if certain areas were not getting enough blood.

The overweight players had substantially more reductions in blood flow in the prefrontal cortex and the temporal pole compared to normal-weight players. Those areas affect reasoning, executive function, emotion, behavior and attention. Those who were overweight also did more poorly on the neuropsychological exams compared to their normal-weight peers.

“In addition to the obvious risk factors from playing contact sports,” the authors wrote, “the additive impact of having excess body mass increases the propensity for further metabolic and neurological complications.”

They added that the combination of higher incidence of obesity and cardiovascular risk factors among former NFL players suggest there could be long-lasting effects on brain health, including complications from chronic traumatic encephalopathy, a neurological condition that can cause brain degeneration as well as symptoms such as anxiety, slow reaction time, depression, aggression, loss of memory and confusion.

Athletes’ health might benefit, the authors added, through education about how to manage their weight.

The study was published online Tuesday in the journal Translational Psychiatry.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Weeb Ewbank’s wife, Lucy, dies at 105 in Ohio

Husband coached the Baltimore Colts from 1954-1962

Baltimore Sun staff
9:17 a.m. EST, January 18, 2012

Lucy Ewbank, wife of former Baltimore Colts coach Weeb Ewbank, died Monday in at The Knolls of Oxford (Ohio). She was 105. Her husband died in 1998.

He coached the Colts from 1954 to 1962, winning championships in 1958 and 1959. He also coached the New York Jets. He went into the Pro Football Hall of Fame in 1978.

According to a news release from Miami University in Oxford, where her husband was an athlete and coach, Mrs. Ewbank is survived by her daughters; Luanne Spenceley, Nancy (Charles) Winner, Jan Hudson; 8 grandchildren, 22 great grandchildren and 6 great great grandchildren.

A memorial service will be held Jan. 21 at 11 a.m. at the Ogle & Paul R. Young Funeral Home in Oxford. In lieu of flowers, the family suggests donations to the Knolls of Oxford Benevolent Fund, Knolls of Oxford Employee fund or Vitas Hospice. Condolences may be sent online to www.smithoglefuneralhome.com.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Community Huddle: Taking a goal line stand on your mind and body

ATTENTION:

All retired players and their families and friends are invited to this event. Spread the word!

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Bills great Kent Hull is dead at age 50

By Mark Gaughn – Buffalo News, posted October 18, 2011

Kent Hull, shown here receiving an award following his retirement, was considered one of the Bills' all-time greatest offensive linemen.

Kent Hull, one of the best players in the Buffalo Bills’ Super Bowl era and one of the
strongest leaders the team ever has seen, has died at age 50.

Hull apparently suffered a heart attack in his hometown of Greenwood, Miss. A family friend at his home could not confirm that this evening.

Hull is the greatest center who ever played for the Bills. He anchored the Bills’ offensive line from 1986 to 1996 and was one of the most important members of the Bills’ no-huddle offense, making all of the line’s blocking adjustments for quarterback Jim Kelly.

A three-time Pro Bowler, Hull was inducted onto the Bills’ Wall of Fame in 2002. He was inducted into the Greater Buffalo Sports Hall of Fame in 1997.

“Of all 47 years of my coaching career, this was one of the most memorable guys I ever had the honor to coach,” said Bills Hall of Fame coach Marv Levy. “I’m so sad to hear it. He was a great leader, certainly. He was as likable a guy as you could meet, family-oriented, a great citizen. I’m stunned.”

“He was bigger than life, and I don’t think he really got his just due, even though he went to some Pro Bowls,” said Bills great receiver Andre Reed. “He was one of the best.”

“Kent was a soft-spoken guy, and he was one of the smartest guys I ever met, too,” Reed said. “I’m sad for his family, and all the people who knew him. He’s going to be missed as a friend.”

“Everybody genuflected to Kent Hull,” former Bills General Manager Bill Polian told The News in 2002. “People don’t realize what a leader he was on that team. When Kent spoke and took a stand, the debate was over. Everybody shut up and followed Kent.”

Hull played college football at Mississippi State and began his pro career in 1983 with the New Jersey Generals of the upstart United States Football League. When the USFL folded, Polian signed him to a Bills contract, and he arrived in Buffalo the same day as Kelly — Aug. 18, 1986.

By coincidence, Hull’s plane arrived in Buffalo 45 minutes ahead of Kelly’s. Kelly rode in a limousine from the airport to a downtown news conference. Hull rode right behind in an equipment van.

“The way I like to describe it is, Jim rode in on a limo and I rode in on a load of pumpkins,” Hull once said.

That was probably the last time he took a back seat with the Bills. He played 189 games over the next 11 seasons, including four Super Bowls. He missed only two games in his Bills career.

Hull, at 6-foot-5 and 285 pounds, brought great athleticism, long arms and natural strength to the center position. But his greatest asset was his sharp mind and knowledge of the game.

“Even Dermontti Dawson said to me Kent was a great, great football player, and Dermontti is going to be in the Hall of Fame soon,” said Reed, referring to Pittsburgh’s dominant center of the 1990s.

“Jim Kelly was the master,” former Bills offensive coordinator and line coach Tom Bresnahan told The News in 2002. “But if he hadn’t had Hull, he couldn’t have run the no-huddle as well. The reason is, we went so fast, especially in the early days when the defenses didn’t understand us. Only a man of football genius, like Kent, could have responded to the calls Jim was making and made his own calls in the limited time available.”

Hull made the Pro Bowl in 1989, 1990 and 1991. The Bills’ offense ranked in the top six in the NFL in yards gained for five straight years, from 1989 to 1993. The Bills were the top-scoring team in the league in 1990 and the top-rushing team in the league in 1991 and 1992.

In his retirement, Hull ran a family farm in Greenwood, Miss, that spanned about 2,500 acres and included about 700 head of cattle.

He is survived by his wife, Kay, and two children, Drew and Ellen.

mgaughan@buffnews.comnull

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 3 Comments

NFL players gave up key “publicity rights” in new CBA

By Jeff Nixon,  posted October 17, 2011

While the new CBA continues to give the NFL the right to use active player images, names and likenesses to publicize and promote NFL football while they are still actively playing, there is some new language that was inserted into the agreement that could have a profound effect on the active player’s publicity rights when they eventually join the ranks of the retired.

The language states: “For purposes of clarity, the foregoing grant of rights includes the right and authority to use, and to authorize affiliates or business partners to use, after the term of this Agreement any Publicity Rights fixed in a tangible medium (e.g. filmed, photographed, recorded or otherwise captured) during the term of this Agreement, any right or authority solely for the purposes described herein.”

Do the active players understand what that means?

By signing their player contract, the active players have now given the NFL the right to sell their NFL game performances in any and all media without having to compensate them after they retire from the NFL.

Not only did the NFLPA and active players give up these property rights, but they allowed new language to be inserted into their contracts that gave away the right to sue or contest the NFL’s use of certain property rights even after the term of the agreement:

“Player and National Football League Players Association, including any of its affiliates (“NFLPA”) do not and will not contest during or after the term of the Agreement, and this hereby confirms their acknowledgement of, exclusive rights of the League, Club and any NFL member club(i) to telecast, broadcast, or otherwise distribute, transmit or perform, on a live, delayed, or archived basis, in any and all media now known or hereafter developed, any NFL games or any excerpts thereof and (ii) to produce, license, offer for sale, market, or otherwise distribute or perform (or authorize a third-party to do any of the foregoing), on a live, delayed, or archived basis, any NFL games or any excerpts thereof, in any and all media now known or hereafter developed, including, but not limited to, packaged or other electronic or digital media.” 

So there it is in a nutshell.  The NFLPA and active players have given away any chance they may have had to receive a fair share of the money the NFL generates from selling the archived footage of their performances in NFL games, or any excerpts of those games after they retire.

The real irony of this story is that NFLPA Executive Director DeMaurice Smith complained about the fact that the NFL owners did not pay retired players for their Legacy. Here is what he said in a June 7, 2010 SB Nation interview: “So I know individual teams sell legacy. My problem is they don’t pay [retired players] for it. And because no team pays for that legacy while they’re selling it, I think if you’re a star running back for your local team and your local team continues to use your name and picture, put it on the wall and basically tells fans to buy tickets for that history, that legacy, that player. You [the NFL] don’t pay that player anything.”   

DeMaurice Smith made that statement and then turned around and negotiated a CBA that takes away some key publicity rights that current players could potentially be paid for when they retire.

Was there some quid pro quo for doing this? It’s hard for me to believe that the NFLPA would give away these key publicity rights without receiving something in return. There were substantial increases in active player benefits over the term of the agreement, so maybe that was the trade-off.

Was it worth the price they paid?    

The NFL and NFL Films have made hundreds of millions off the sale of films, videos and dvd’s that have captured player’s performances over the past 50 years. I wrote about this in an article entitled – The NFL Legacy: Created in our image. The money from the sale of digital media will continue to grow and grow but the current players made a decision to forego the possibility of ever getting a piece of that property rights pie.

In contrast to what the active players have done, it is important to know that retired players never gave away their publicity rights and that is why there is a series of Class Action lawsuits  currently working their way through the courts.

The retired NFL players allege that the NFL, including its NFL Films division, has – and continues – to use retired players’ identities to promote the league and earn substantial revenues without consent from the players.

“There is no dispute that these videos promote the NFL,” said Bob Stein, a former NFL player and attorney representing the players. “This suit is on behalf of thousands of players who want nothing more than to obtain their fair share of the revenues the NFL has earned, and the brand it has built due to their contributions. This is especially current with the growth of distribution channels such as the NFL network and worldwide internet marketing.”

It is interesting to note that when the new standard player contract language was revised to give away the active player’s publicity rights even after the term of the agreement, they did not use the words “in perpetuity” which is the standard language used in most contracts to mean “forever.” I believe that was purposely done as defensive strategy against the aforementioned lawsuits. The NFL has used the term “in perpetuity” in many other contracts, but unfortunately for them, they never used it in the previous standard player contracts, so instead they said “For purposes of clarity” to imply that it was always their intent to retain these publicity rights into perpetuity. 

While it might be clear to them, it was never clear to retired players – and it won’t be clear to the court or a jury that hears this case. The fact that the NFL and NFLPA put this new language in the new CBA may even help the retired player case, because it shows how they are now closing the legal door on player publicity rights after they have retired.    

While retired players continue to fight to protect their publicity rights and get paid a fair share of the revenue that has been generated over the past 50 years, the NFLPA and the active players just made the mistake of giving their’s away in what I believe was an exchange for more “money now” in the new CBA agreement.

I think the NFL knows that former players have a very good publicity rights class action lawsuit against them and that is why they negotiated the future “publicity rights” away from the active players in this new CBA. They don’t want this to be an ongoing problem. 

The owners know that at some point down the road they may have to come to a large monetary settlement with former players. They don’t want the current players following us down that road, so they set up a detour. That detour probably led the active players to a quick pot of gold, but they gave up some important publicity rights to get it.

Will the active players come to regret their short-sighted decision in the future?

If retired players win their class action lawsuit and start receiving royalties, or a share of the proceeds that were generated from the sale of our images, the active players may start to second guess their decision. 

While we all await the outcome of the Class Action lawsuit, you can always go to the Hulu website and watch some of the greatest games ever played – the retired player “Legacy” now captured in digital format into perpetuity! 

I wonder how much Hulu paid the NFL to use our images?  

We already know how much we got paid!

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

Statement from Fourth & Goal President Bruce Laird on the passing of Patricia Modell

Patricia and Art Modell

Mahatma Gandhi once said, “Man can never be a woman’s equal in the spirit of selfless service withwhich nature has endowed her.” A gracious and generous woman, Pat Modell wasthe epitome of selfless service in the community, in the league and in the home.  She was the rock on whom Art Modell depended. She was vocal in her support of retired NFL players, at a time when far too many remained silent.

Pat Modell’s legacy will live on in the organizations she supported, in the memories she left and in the family she loved. Our thoughts and prayers are with Art, the Modell family and the Baltimore Ravens.

Bruce Laird
President, Fourth & Goal
Baltimore Colts, 1972-1981
San Diego Chargers,1982-1983

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Finalizing the Legacy Fund benefit for former NFL players

In a recent article I wrote and posted on Fourth and Goal, I made the following statement: 

“If the NFLPA expects the NFL to send them a counter proposal, they may be waiting until hell freezes over. This is a negotiating process and I doubt the League is going to put out one specific counter proposal. The NFL has several proposals they would like to discuss with the Union, but unless the NFLPA comes to the table, this thing could drag on for quite some time.”

I could be wrong, but I don’t think the NFL wants to get into a public negotiating process with the NFLPA by sending counter proposals back and forth. I think the NFL would prefer to sit down face-to-face with Union officials and their former player reps and negotiate the best distribution method possible, but only after taking into account ALL retired player suggestions and recommendations.  

When the NFLPA was negotiating with the NFL – before and after the lockout – both sides agreed that they would not divulge the substance of their discussions. Why should our benefit negotiations be any different? 

It is my understanding that the League is still collecting retired player suggestions and recommendations on how to distribute the Legacy benefit and has set a deadline of October 3rd (today) to receive that information. Hopefully, the NFLPA will be prepared to meet with the NFL as soon as possible. 

This time the NFLPA might want to consider bringing Jim McFarland to the meeting since he was elected by the NFLPA Former Player Chapter membership to represent them at the table.  Jim was noticeably missing from the NFLPA’s list of representatives that were scheduled to attend the NFL’s September 15th meeting. As you know, the NFLPA did not attend that meeting because Carl Eller was invited.

Ever since Jim McFarland stated his objections to the way the NFLPA was proposing to distribute the Legacy Benefit, it appears that DeMaurice Smith has added his name to the Gene Upshaw blacklist.

If that is how the NFLPA treats its own elected former player representative, then what does that say about their pledge to give former players a “voice” at the table? 

Was it all just empty rhetoric designed to keep former players quiet while the NFLPA took us to the cleaners?

I would like to point out that the NFLPA’s proposal is quite different from what DeMaurice Smith was “selling” retired players last year. 

In a June 7, 2010 SB Nation interview, Mr. Smith said So I’ve said every team should make a contribution of at least a million dollars a year for a total of $32 million a year for what I would call the legacy fund. That legacy fund should go to all the player’s pensions who played prior to 1993 and that would increase all their pensions by, get this, $1,000 per month.” 

As it turns out, the NFL and NFLPA agreed to put almost twice as much – $62 million annually – into the Legacy fund, so by Mr. Smith’s calculations shouldn’t all pre-1993 players be getting almost a $2,000 per month increase in their pensions? This would actually be more in line with the formal resolution that was unanimously adopted at the NFLPA convention in Maui last year. 

I have to assume that Mr. Smith had some actuarial consultants advise him before he made that SB Nation interview statement. He should have been able to find a few good pension advisers with the approximately $11 million in staff operating costs they have in their annual budget.  

If you read the NFLPA’s Legacy Fund proposal, you will discover that a majority of former players will be receiving a monthly pension increase that is significantly lower than $1,000. 

Based on what DeMaurice Smith said, $2,000 should be the “floor.” Unfortunately many former players are being shown nothing but the door!

Under the NFLPA’s proposal for distributing the Legacy benefit you will need at least 9 years (credited seasons) to get a $1,000 monthly payment.    

Maybe during the discovery phase of the Retired Player Class Action lawsuit against the NFLPA we will find out what really happened to the Pension and Legacy Fund benefit increases we were promised.  

Posted in Uncategorized | 12 Comments

Current NFL stars forgetting about past heroes is disgraceful

By
CBSSports.com National Columnist   Sep. 15, 2011  

Elvin Bethea (left), inducted into the Hall of Fame in 2003, calls himself 'one of the lucky ones.' (Getty Images)

If what I’m hearing is true, the NFL is full of snakes and scoundrels. If what I’m hearing is true, NFL players are a despicable bunch, and for the sake of this story I’m not talking about the criminals and killers in the league today. For the sake of this story I’m talking about the leaders, the best of the best, the players who are the face of the NFL. Drew Brees, Tom Brady and Peyton Manning. I’m talking about men like that.

And I’ll say this: What I’m hearing? I believe it is true. I believe it with all my broken heart.

My heart breaks for men like Earl Campbell and Elvin Bethea, crumbling men who gave their health to the NFL and have in return been given a middle finger from the current players.

What I’m hearing isn’t from some unnamed source who is afraid to dish this dirt in public. It isn’t conjecture or theory. It’s a statement of fact — spoken, and in legal documents — from an attorney in Washington, D.C., who represents the 28 former NFL players who filed a class-action lawsuit in federal court Tuesday against the NFLPA and a handful of individuals, including Brady and union president DeMaurice Smith.

Of those 28 former players who put their names to the lawsuit, 23 are Hall of Famers – household names like Eller and Lilly, Marchetti and Bednarik. Leroy Kelly. Charley Taylor. Don Maynard. Mel Renfro. Names like that. Legends.

Their attorney, Michael Hausfeld, broke down their lawsuit with some numbers that are so astonishing, so awful, it made my skin crawl.

“Here’s some basic math,” Hausfeld told me Wednesday, providing one of many heartbreaking facts from the 52-page court filing. “The league said [during labor negotiations earlier this year], ‘Reduce rookie salaries by $300 million a year. Split that between active players and retired players. That means $150 million for retired players every year for 10 years. That’s $1.5 billion over 10 years. In addition, there was a pledge for roughly $50 million toward the annual Legacy Fund. So that’s a total of $200 million a year — times 10 years, that’s $2 billion. “[But] after the players were finished negotiating with the league [in July], retirees only got $700 million over 10 years. Where did the other $1.3 billion go?”

Hall of Fame defensive end Elvin Bethea, one of the 28 plaintiffs against the NFLPA, has a pretty good idea.

“The current players,” Bethea said, “kept it for themselves.”

Chilling. Heartbreaking. Infuriating. Pick your adjective, and that’s it. That’s Drew Brees and Tom Brady and Peyton Manning and the rest of the NFLPA’s leaders, shortsighted men who — if what I’m hearing is true — used the latest labor negotiations to cram more money into their bulging pockets rather than give it to the men who made their wealth possible.

A man like Curt Marsh, the Raiders’ No. 1 pick in 1981 who played six years and has undergone more than 20 surgeries, many on his right foot. But no more on that foot, because that sucker’s gone. Amputated. Football injury. How is Curt Marsh paying for those procedures? Damned if I know, but he’s not using NFL insurance because it doesn’t exist. Not for retired players.

“The day I retired in 1983, my insurance retired too,” Bethea says. “No health coverage. No disability. No nothing.”

The NFL and NFLPA have rectified some of that, allowing for disability for former players. Hausfeld and Bethea want to be clear on this: The NFLPA didn’t simply abandon them. In the latest CBA, the NFLPA increased the amount of funds directed toward retired players — but what the NFLPA did was slap a chintzy band-aid on this spurting wound. Picture a rich banker walking past a former colleague, now impoverished, and throwing three nickels at him. As if that’s going to help.

“That [$50 million annual] Legacy Fund contribution I mentioned earlier? [Active] players’ contribution to that is roughly $15 million a year — out of revenue to the players of a minimum of $4.5 billion annually,” Hausfeld said. “That’s less than ½ of 1 percent. That’s your context here.”

That’s monstrous, and disability payments aren’t exactly easy for retired players to get. According to the lawsuit filed Tuesday, barely half the retirees who filed for disability in 2010 received anything in return. And of the more than 10,000 former NFL players, the plaintiffs say, “it is estimated that less than 300 have received long-term disability payments.”

A guy like Mike Webster, the former Steelers center, was so battered that he ended up tormented, homeless, dead at 50. Colts tight end John Mackey’s dementia was such that he would turn on the television in the years before his death in July at 69, watch the Colts game and get angry when he realized that the guy wearing No. 88 wasn’t John Mackey. Oilers running back Earl Campbell once ran over linebackers, but now he rides along in a wheelchair, three vertebra removed from his back, his knees ruined, a drooping foot unresponsive. Defensive backs Dave Duerson and Andre Waters committed suicide, neither older than 50, both suffering from chronic traumatic encephalopathy — a fancy way of saying their brains had been bashed in during football.

Those are not low-profile stories. Those players were legends, heroes and John Mackey in particular was the first president of the NFLPA. I would say this is galling, but galling doesn’t begin to cover it.

“Disgraceful,” is how Hausfeld puts it, and I’ll defer to the attorney here. Because he’s right. Retired players are dying miserable deaths, guilty of bad timing, having played this violent sport in an era when concussions weren’t understood, injuries weren’t nurtured and salaries weren’t enormous.

“They were guinea pigs,” Hausfeld said.

I called the NFLPA for their side, and communications director Carl Francis called back to say he had no comment. Wait a minute, I said. What about these numbers from Hausfeld and the lawsuit — what about the current players basically negotiating retired players out of hundreds of millions of dollars in benefits?

“I can’t confirm that,” Francis said. “I don’t know.”

OK, fine. But here’s what we do know. We know that a guy like Elvin Bethea, a future Hall of Famer, was paid so poorly in the 1970s that he had to work in the offseason for a big-and-tall clothing store before catching on with Anheuser-Busch as a salesman. He kept that job after he retired from the NFL, giving him the insurance benefits to pay for his 13 operations. He remembers one time a hospital bill for $93,000 came to his house after knee surgery. The insurance company paid for it, but the memory shakes Bethea still.

“What about the players who didn’t have a job like I had after they retired [from the NFL]?” he says. “A lot of guys couldn’t find that kind of work. A lot of guys couldn’t work. I was one of the lucky ones.”

That’s one way of looking at it. Brees offered another perspective, suggesting that people like Bethea were the smart ones, and the rest — those who couldn’t afford their surgeries — were irresponsible beggars. This is what Brees said in 2009 about retired NFL players, according to the lawsuit filed Tuesday:

“There’s some guys out there that have made bad business decisions,” Brees said. “They took their pensions early because they never went out and got a job. They’ve had a couple divorces and they’re making payments to this place and that place. And that’s why they don’t have money. And they’re coming to us to basically say, ‘Please make up for my bad judgment.’”

That was Drew Brees, nearing the final year of a $60 million contract, judging players from the Elvin Bethea era. As a rookie, Bethea made $15,000.

Today he can’t hold a gallon of milk. His wrists hurt too bad. Then again, after all his knee and back surgeries, he can’t stand for more than a minute or two. So when would he have time to hold the milk? And Elvin Bethea says he’s one of the lucky ones.

“I am,” he says. “I really am.”

God help the unlucky ones.

The NFLPA won’t.

Posted in Uncategorized | 34 Comments

Why was the NFLPA a “No Show” for NFL meeting on Legacy Fund?

In a September 14, 2011 email, Nolan Harrison III explained why the NFLPA representatives did not attend the meeting last Thursday by saying “As many of you know, Cornelius Bennett, Tom DePaso and myself were going to attend a meeting tomorrow in New York with Goodell to speak about the Legacy Benefit. Due to the Eller II law suit being filed against the NFLPA today, council has advised us not to attend as one of the named plaintiffs will be in attendance. This is unfortunate timing as we are all wanting to complete the bargaining session with the NFL so that we can implement the Legacy benefit which has been delayed for the past four weeks. At the conclusion of the meeting the NFLPA intends to request that the NFL responds with a counter proposal and timeline so that we can get this benefit into your hands as soon as possible.”

The “named” plantiff that Mr. Harrison was referring to was Carl Eller. As you know, Carl and many other Hall of Fame players have filed a class action lawsuit against the NFLPA. You can read the Class Action Court Document at the bottom of this article. 

The NFLPA was not only a “no show” for the meeting, but on top of that they had the audacity to blame the NFL for delaying the final passage of the Legacy Fund benefit. Indirectly, they are also blaming Carl Eller and the other Hall of Famers because they had the nerve to file a lawsuit against them.

Heaven forbid the NFLPA should sit across the table from someone that is suing them!

On the other hand, the NFL had no problem sitting down with Tom Brady, Drew Brees and Mike Vrabel when those players were actively suing them – and making decisions on how retired player benefits should be funded.

If the NFLPA had bothered to ask, I think the League negotiators would have met with them separately, either before or after the meeting they had with Bruce Laird, Carl Eller, Willie Lanier, George Martin and Ron Mix. By doing so, they could have reduced the length of time it would have taken to resolve this issue.

Apparently, the NFLPA is perfectly content with the proposal they submitted to the NFL, even though Jim McFarland, one of the key “elected” representatives for NFLPA former player members has voiced several objections to the way the NFLPA is proposing to distribute the funding.

It is interesting to note that Jim McFarland was not among the NFLPA reps that were listed to meet with the NFL. I guess the NFLPA didn’t want the potential embarrassment of having their own former player rep sitting at the table disagreeing with their proposal.

Although I don’t always see eye-to-eye with Jim, I will always have great admiration for his decision to speak out about the Legacy Fund and provide additional recommendations on how it should be allocated.

The reason Commissioner Goodell called for a meeting with former players is simple – he wanted to get as much input from them as he possibly could.

It is important for all retired players to remember this one very important fact: The NFLPA does not have the “exclusive” right to bargain on behalf of retired players. The Commissioner knows full well that the NFLPA does not represent all retired players, so he reached out to some prominent retired player advocates to get some additional advice and recommendations on the distribution of the Legacy benefit.

I know there are guys out there that will question why the NFL Commissioner chose the former players that he did, but I for one am satisfied that he had the right people at the table. Whether the NFLPA or NFL choose to listen to the advice of those former players is another story.

So now that the NFLPA has acted like a spoiled child and has taken their ball home with them, when will they come back out and play?

If they haven’t already done so, the NFL and the NFLPA need to schedule a meeting today and get the Legacy benefit issue ironed out. If the NFLPA expects the NFL to send them a counter proposal, they may be waiting until hell freezes over.  This is a negotiating process and I doubt the League is going to put out one specific counter proposal. The NFL has several proposals they would like to discuss with the Union, but unless the NFLPA comes to the table, this thing could drag on for quite some time.

After they come to an agreement, the NFLPA can sit back and slap themselves on the back for another successful “shell game” where they left retired players wondering where the ball went.

The fact is, the ball was never under the shell to begin with……it was in their pocket (and the active player pockets) from the start of the game.

If Carl Eller and the Hall of Fame players are successful in their litigation on behalf of retired players, we just might get a chance to see where the ball went during the “discovery phase” of the trial.

Hopefully, the Carl Eller lawsuit can expose some of the inequities in the distribution of retired player benefits, along with the inherent conflict of interest that was taking place when the union was decertified (but still acting like a union) and the active players were – wink wink – helping us out.

Just for the record, here is what Carl Eller and the former players involved in the Eller I litigation team proposed for retired player benefits via the Pension Plan: 

Pension Fund Settlement Proposal

I. Pension

A. Benefit Increase

We propose the following Benefit Credit enhancements under The Bert Bell/Pete Roselle NFL Player Retirement Plan (the “Retirement Plan”):

Credited Season Current Benefit Credit    Proposed Benefit Credit*

Before 1982                $250                                        $500

1982 through 1992     $255                                        $505

1993 and 1994            $265                                         $515

1995 and 1996            $315                                          $565

1997                             $365                                          $615

1998 and later           $470                                           $650

* Proposed Benefit Credit increases will be effective July 1, 2011 for all Retirement Plan participants, whether or not the participant has commenced distribution of his pension benefit. The Proposed Benefit Credit will be subject to the same adjustments for retirement before or after Normal Retirement Date and for optional forms of payment that are in the current Retirement Plan.

Proposed Cost:

At the June 6, 2011 meeting the NFL reps said Aon Hewitt estimated the liability attributable to this proposal to be approximately $1.3 billion. Based on the 2010 valuation interest rate of 7.25% and a 15 year amortization schedule, this translates into annual funding payments of approximately $150 million.

B. Vesting Enhancements:

We propose the following vesting enhancements under the Retirement Plan:

Current vesting is determined as follows (with certain disability and other exceptions):

(a) five Credited Seasons (for pre-1974 players)

(b) four Credited Seasons (for players who play after 1973)

(c) three Credited Seasons (for players who play after 1992)

Proposed new vesting schedule:

Aon Hewitt has not yet provided us the data to fully price out these proposals. However, at the aforementioned June 6th meeting, the NFL reps said there were 378 former players who had three Credited Seasons but not four Credited Seasons when vesting was reduced to four credited seasons. The NFL reps said the liability attributable to vesting these former players was $49.9 million. Based on the 2010 valuation interest rate of 7.25% and a 15 year amortization schedule, this translates into annual funding payments of approximately $5.5 million.

Posted in Uncategorized | 15 Comments

CBS: Commissioner Convenes “Historic Meeting” with Retired Players

Posted on NFLCommunications.com  September 18, 2011

The NFL Today’s Charley Casserly reported today on the CBS pre-game show that Commissioner Roger Goodell held a “historic meeting” this past week with retired players to discuss the distribution of the $620 million Legacy Fund created by the league’s new collective bargaining agreement.

Casserly reported that Pro Football Hall of Famers Carl Eller (Retired Players Association), Willie Lanier (Hall of Fame Foundation) and Ron Mix (Hall of Fame Foundation) attended the meeting Thursday with Bruce Laird (Fourth and Goal) and George Martin (NFL Alumni Association). The views of Mike Ditka (Gridiron Greats) were expressed by the commissioner who had met with Ditka one-on-one earlier in the month on the same issue.

Commissioner Goodell and Jeff Pash, the NFL’s general counsel, will meet next with NFLPA Executive Director DeMaurice Smith and the union to work toward a final agreement on how to distribute the fund.

The additional dispersal of money to approximately 2,500 players who played in the league before 1993 and who already receive an NFL pension will begin shortly after that agreement is reached.

NFL INSIDER CHARLEY CASSERLY

CBS NFL TODAY

9/18/11

James Brown: “A lot of retired players have been complaining about benefits. What is the NFL doing about this matter?”

Charley Casserly: “I learned that this past Thursday Commissioner Goodell had a confidential meeting with the most vocal leaders of the retired players’ groups. At the meeting were Bruce Laird, Ron Mix, Willie Lanier, Carl Eller, and George Martin. Mike Ditka was not at the meeting, but had input to the meeting. To me, this is a historic meeting, because it is the first time retired players have been able to meet with the league and have a voice in how the hundreds of millions of dollars will be distributed to the players in the pension fund, both their peers and the players who helped make this league great. The final note here is that the next step is for Commissioner Goodell to meet with the NFLPA — who was invited to the meeting but did not attend — to make a final determination of how the money is going to be split up.

The article can be seen at this link: http://nflcommunications.com/2011/09/18/cbs-commissioner-convenes-%E2%80%9Chistoric-meeting%E2%80%9D-with-retired-players/

Posted in Uncategorized | 16 Comments